Record review & indexing
Every page read and indexed by date, provider, encounter type and subject. Duplicates across productions identified and reconciled.
Isis Discovery reads every page of a production and returns the case picture inside it: what was said, to whom, when, and where it contradicts itself. Every entry is cited to the page it came from, so your team can put it in front of a judge.
Patient reports the medication was prescribed by her pain specialist and requests a refill today.
Urine screen collected. Prescribed medication: not detected.
Productions arrive as scans, out of order and full of duplicates. The facts that decide a case are a single line in a note, a lab value, or a date that doesn't match. Finding them by hand takes weeks. Missing one can cost you the case.
Keyword search tells you where a word appears. Context tells you what it means: who said it, who it was said to, what happened before and after, and what the rest of the record says about it.
Every page read and indexed by date, provider, encounter type and subject. Duplicates across productions identified and reconciled.
Visits, prescriptions, test results and reported incidents on a single timeline. Color-coded calendars show at a glance what a table would bury.
Statements compared across providers and over time. Repeated requests, early refills, multiple prescribers and results that don't match the prescription record.
Page-and-line summaries of transcripts, cross-referenced to the records each answer touches. Outlines of what the record supports and what it doesn't.
Organized, numbered exhibits with an index whose every citation opens the source document at the cited page, for the court, co-counsel or your expert.
Bring one question (when did this start, who prescribed it, was it ever reported) and get a cited answer drawn from the whole record.
A disciplined, repeatable process, so every output can be checked against the page it came from.
You send the productions as they arrived. We inventory every file, count every page and flag duplicates and gaps before analysis begins.
Every page is read, including scans and handwriting where legible, and captured with its date, author, setting and verbatim text.
Entries are aligned across providers and time. Dates are corrected to the event, not the signature. Statements are compared for consistency.
Chronologies, calendars, summaries and memos, where every entry carries a citation that opens the source page.
Built to be read by a judge in five minutes, then checked line by line by opposing counsel.
| Date | Event | Record says | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/02 | ER visit after a reported fall; imaging normal | “No acute fracture.” | P04·p.18 |
| 03/09 | RequestAsks primary care for a stronger medication | “…requests something stronger.” | P02·p.141 |
| 03/10 | RefusedOrthopedist declines; recommends therapy | “…not indicated at this time.” | P06·p.33 |
| 03/16 | Second missed therapy session | “Did not attend; no call.” | P09·p.7 |
| 03/21 | LabPrescribed drug not detected | “Inconsistent – Negative.” | P02·p.188 |
Excerpts are fictional examples showing the format of our deliverables.
Analysis is only useful if it survives scrutiny. These rules apply to every deliverable we produce.
No finding appears without the production and page it came from. If we can't point to it, we don't say it.
The record's own words are reproduced verbatim. We never sharpen a statement into something stronger than what the page says.
What the record says and what it suggests are kept visibly separate, so you always know which is which.
Innocent explanations, gaps and records that cut the other way are flagged, before opposing counsel finds them for you.
Any case where the truth is spread across hundreds of documents from many sources.
Tell us about the matter, the volume of records and your deadline. We'll scope the review and the deliverables you need.